Search

Hurdles to be overcome & Key Players, Movers and Shakers

Hurdles to be overcome


National research and Investment

In 2007, Eurogroup conducted a Survey of National Research Expenditure on 3R alternatives. The results were revealing: over 2006/2007 France gave €2.7 million for alternatives research, compared to UK’s €14.4 million, and Germany’s €4.6 million. [Source: Eurogroup]. Even though France uses the highest number of animals in experiments of any EU member state.  For other EU member states the level of investment in 3R’s is much, much lower still.

EU Directive 2010/63/EU adopted in September 2010 and which enters into force from 1st January 2013, requires member states to nominate a centre that will promote alternatives at a national level.  These national centres of 3Rs expertise will undertake validation studies, and provide a hub for 3Rs research. In this way every member state can play their part.

Validation and regulatory acceptance
Before alternative methods can be used in the mainstream to replace animal testing, they have to undergo validation and international regulatory acceptance, which can take up to 9 years. Estimates put the cost of validating each new alternative typically at $300,0005 (€193,610). In Europe, this is undertaken by ECVAM (European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods). 

Given that each country has their own specific regulations regarding safety testing, securing international regulatory acceptance for a new testing method is a time-consuming, tedious process. Speeding up the process of regulatory acceptance, ensuring regulatory bodies adopt replacements as soon as they become available has to be a priority.

Institutional change
The report Toxicology in the 21st Century” (National Research Council, 2007), sets out a blueprint for a new approach to toxicity testing – one which doesn’t use animals. Nurturing the right conditions in which researchers feel able to make the necessary shifts in perception and orientation is vital.

Co-operation and research dissemination are key components in ensuring the worldwide research community progress towards non-animal research methods. Centres of excellence, trade organisations, scientific institutes to name a few each play a part in this, informing membership, forging links and moving forward together.

Interdisciplinary approach
Many recent breakthroughs in alternatives have come about through different disciplines working together, for instance innovations in nanotechnology have been used in the field of tissue-engineering to construct 3D tissue models. This highlights the importance of an inter-disciplinary approach.

 

Key Players, Movers and Shakers

NC3Rs

National Centre for Replacement, Reduction and  
Refinement (NC3Rs)

Since its inception, Naturewatch has been firmly behind the NC3Rs - read press release here [pdf]. From its opening in 2004, the NC3Rs has delivered innovative programs to help overcome hurdles that hamper the development and implementation of the 3Rs.  Each year it funding organises training courses and conferences and attitudinal barriers to name a few.

 

European Centre for Validating Alternative Methods (ECVAM)

Plays a vital role overseeing validation of new alternatives, and EU funded research programs including: the Toxdrop program to develop alternative toxicology tests; and the Sens-it-iv program developing non-animal skin sensitisation tests.

European Partnership for Animal Alternatives (EPAA)
 
Formed in 2005, this partnership includes industry bodies, companies and the European Commission. The EPAA promotes development and implementation of validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods in the field of safety testing.
 
In addition to the UK and EU funded organisations
 
Many other organisations are researching or funding research into non-animal alternatives. Each play a vital role in turning the vision of humane scientific research into a reality:
  • Humane Research Trust
  • Dr Hadwen Trust
  • Lord Dowding Trust
  • FRAME